Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video389 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Farah Khan results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 139 hits. Analysis detected 553 faulty-reasoning hits from 389 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (26,124 of 28,364 speakers). This Dr Farah Khan is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Dr Farah Khan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠8%Dr Farah Khan (selected)9%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 389
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos389 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 10.2%10.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 9.2%9.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.1%5.1%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 3.6%3.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 13.9%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Middle Ground: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos