Speaker summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr Elizabeth Erwin results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Negativity Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 174 hits . Analysis detected 772 faulty-reasoning hits from 736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 5% (24,684 of 25,889 speakers). This Dr Elizabeth Erwin is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. Dr Elizabeth Erwin
Speaker details
Total words: 736
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.7% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos736 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.6% 23.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 6.4% 6.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Personal Incredulity Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Personal Incredulity: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst