Speaker summary
97%1 analyzed article/video55 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DownDetector results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 76.4% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 189 faulty-reasoning hits from 55 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of 64% (10,237 of 28,364 speakers). This DownDetector is worse (more manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
DownDetector
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 55
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

64% percentile
025507510063.9% percentile
49.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos55 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 67.3%67.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 76.4%76.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 56.4%56.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 43.6%43.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.7%32.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Negativity Bias: Speaker 76.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 67.3%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 56.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 43.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.7%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos