Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video120.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Douglas Casa results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Pessimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 45.1% saturation with 83 hits. Analysis detected 273.597 faulty-reasoning hits from 120.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 28% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (15,590 of 28,364 speakers). This Douglas Casa is better (less manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group.
Douglas Casa
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠45%Douglas Casa (selected)29%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 120.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510045.0% percentile
28.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos120.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 56.1%56.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 45.1%45.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 40.2%40.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 56.1%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 45.1%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Speaker 40.2%, sitewide 1.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos