Speaker summary
⁠26%2 analyzed articles/videos141.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug Rader results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Pessimism Bias, with Hindsight Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 43 faulty-reasoning hits from 141.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,095 of 28,364 speakers). This Doug Rader is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group.
Doug Rader
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 141.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.5% percentile
10.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos141.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.8%8.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos