Speaker summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos261.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doris Landaverde results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Red Herring, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 235.258 faulty-reasoning hits from 261.5 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (26,898 of 28,364 speakers). This Doris Landaverde is better (less manipulative) than 94.80% of the peer group.
Doris Landaverde
Speaker details
Total words: 261.5
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751005.2% percentile
6.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos261.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 5.7%5.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 5.1%5.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Red Herring: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos