Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DOJ spokesperson results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Begging the Question, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 75 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,312 of 28,364 speakers). This DOJ spokesperson is worse (more manipulative) than 74.20% of the peer group.
DOJ spokesperson
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.2% percentile
58.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 54.7%54.7%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 45.3%45.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 45.3%45.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 54.7%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 45.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos