Speaker summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 3,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dmytro Kuleba results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 287.625 hits . Analysis detected 3,588.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,256 of 28,364 speakers). This Dmytro Kuleba is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Dmytro Kuleba
Speaker details
Total words: 3,044
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst