Speaker summary
49%1 analyzed article/video3,044 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dmytro Kuleba results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 287.625 hits. Analysis detected 3,588.875 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (28,256 of 28,364 speakers). This Dmytro Kuleba is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Dmytro Kuleba
Speaker details
Total words: 3,044
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.4% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 3.3%3.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.0%5.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos