Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dina Karari results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,159 of 28,364 speakers). This Dina Karari is worse (more manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Dina Karari
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510095.9% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos