Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video326 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dietra Wise Baker results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Optimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46% saturation with 170.231 hits. Analysis detected 615.701 faulty-reasoning hits from 326 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,847 of 28,364 speakers). This Dietra Wise Baker is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group.
Dietra Wise Baker
Speaker details
Total words: 326
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.0% percentile
18.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos326 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.0%46.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 18.8%18.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos