Speaker summary
76% 1 analyzed article/video 382.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dick Vermeil results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Self-Serving Bias , and Sunk Cost Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 259 hits . Analysis detected 939.825 faulty-reasoning hits from 382.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.9% and a BS Rank of 11% (37,811 of 42,140 speakers). This Dick Vermeil is better (less manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Dick Vermeil
Speaker details
Total words: 382.333
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.3% percentile 8.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos382.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 39.0% 39.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 13.1% 13.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 10.9% 10.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 11.7% 11.7% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 0.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst