Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video67.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diane J. results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 67.5 hits. Analysis detected 157.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 67.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 83.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (5,036 of 28,364 speakers). This Diane J. is worse (more manipulative) than 82.20% of the peer group.
Diane J.
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠83%Diane J. (selected)84%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 67.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510082.2% percentile
83.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos67.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos