Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video23 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diane results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Burden of Proof, and Pessimism Bias, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 95.7% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 110 faulty-reasoning hits from 23 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 95.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,810 of 28,364 speakers). This Diane is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group.
Diane
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 23
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510083.0% percentile
95.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos23 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 95.7%95.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 95.7%95.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 95.7%95.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 95.7%95.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 95.7%95.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 95.7%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 95.7%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 95.7%, sitewide 0.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 95.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 95.7%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos