Speaker summary
⁠84%3 analyzed articles/videos88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diana DeGette results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Optimism Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 60.7% saturation with 85 hits. Analysis detected 308.629 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 41.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (11,549 of 28,364 speakers). This Diana DeGette is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Diana DeGette
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
41.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 75.7%75.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 60.7%60.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 35.0%35.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.7%25.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Ad Hominem: Speaker 75.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 60.7%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 35.0%, sitewide 6.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos