Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deputy District Attorney Daniel Madow results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 68 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,134 of 28,364 speakers). This Deputy District Attorney Daniel Madow is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Deputy District Attorney Daniel Madow
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Recency Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Recency BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos