Speaker summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of Financial and Professional Regulation results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 145 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (12,480 of 43,500 speakers). This Department of Financial and Professional Regulation is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Department of Financial and Professional Regulation
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos