Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video43 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denis Phillips results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 142 faulty-reasoning hits from 43 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 67.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,043 of 28,364 speakers). This Denis Phillips is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group.
Denis Phillips
Speaker details
Total words: 43
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.7% percentile
67.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos43 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 68.6%68.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 34.3%34.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 68.6%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 34.3%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos