Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic Socialist of America results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 52 hits. Analysis detected 260 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠96% (1,053 of 26,056 speakers). This Democratic Socialist of America is worse (more manipulative) than 96.00% of the peer group.
Democratic Socialist of America
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.9%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos