Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Democratic senators results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Quote-first Misdirection, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75.3% saturation with 68.177 hits. Analysis detected 209.177 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 52.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (8,010 of 28,364 speakers). This Democratic senators is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Democratic senators
Speaker details
Total words: 73
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
52.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos73 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.3%75.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 64.2%64.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 35.9%35.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 33.0%33.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 64.2%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 35.9%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 33.0%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos