Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 58.6% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 130 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,905 of 28,364 speakers). This Defense Innovation Unit (DIU) is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Defense Innovation Unit (DIU)
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
44.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 58.6%58.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 41.4%41.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.4%41.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 58.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 41.4%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos