Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video52.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Deep Singh Badhesha results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 72.1% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 86 faulty-reasoning hits from 52.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,695 of 28,364 speakers). This Deep Singh Badhesha is worse (more manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
Deep Singh Badhesha
Speaker details
Total words: 52.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

69% percentile
025507510069.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 72.1%72.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 72.1%72.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 27.9%27.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 72.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 72.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos