Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video34.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Debbie Smith results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Unattributed Quote, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 19.5 hits. Analysis detected 45.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (17,381 of 37,316 speakers). This Debbie Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Debbie Smith
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠54%Debbie Smith (selected)34%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos