Speaker summary
⁠26%5 analyzed articles/videos500 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dean Crispen results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 369.432 faulty-reasoning hits from 500 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠2% (28,037 of 28,364 speakers). This Dean Crispen is better (less manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group.
Dean Crispen

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751001.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score5 analyzed videos500 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 2.4%2.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.2%10.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos