Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These DC Studios results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Indoctrination, and Status Quo Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 62 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,973 of 28,364 speakers). This DC Studios is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
DC Studios
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
60.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 62.9%62.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 37.1%37.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%False Dilemma: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 62.9%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 26.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos