Speaker summary
⁠73%1 analyzed article/video69.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dayne Moth results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, False Dilemma, and Begging the Question, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 338.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 69.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,442 of 28,364 speakers). This Dayne Moth is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Dayne Moth
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 69.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
56.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos69.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 87.5%87.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 80.8%80.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 40.4%40.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 43.8%43.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 87.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 80.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 43.8%, sitewide 8.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 40.4%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos