Speaker summary
⁠72%3 analyzed articles/videos247.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dayna Lincoln results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 407.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 247.5 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (21,109 of 28,364 speakers). This Dayna Lincoln is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Dayna Lincoln
Speaker details
Total words: 247.5
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
16.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos247.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 26.4%26.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.8%15.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 13.2%13.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos