Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video144.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Davina McCall results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 21.5% saturation with 28.982 hits. Analysis detected 52.554 faulty-reasoning hits from 144.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,504 of 28,364 speakers). This Davina McCall is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Davina McCall
Speaker details
Total words: 144.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
19.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos144.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.5%17.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Halo Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 6.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos