Speaker summary
⁠36%3 analyzed articles/videos123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Venturella results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Recency Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.6% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 195.09 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 27% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (15,999 of 28,364 speakers). This David Venturella is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
David Venturella
Speaker details
Total words: 123
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

44% percentile
025507510043.6% percentile
27.0% BS Score3 analyzed videos123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 28.5%28.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.6%37.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 21.0%21.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.6%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos