Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video408 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Stras results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 25.2% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 643 faulty-reasoning hits from 408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (25,565 of 28,364 speakers). This David Stras is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
David Stras
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.9% percentile
9.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos408 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 24.8%24.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.2%15.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.3%8.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 4.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 0.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos