Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video59 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David_Steiner results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 59 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,458 of 28,364 speakers). This David_Steiner is worse (more manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group.
David_Steiner
Speaker details
Total words: 59
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.7% percentile
56.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos59 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.4%42.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.4%42.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.4%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos