Speaker summary
⁠79%1 analyzed article/video162.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Snyder results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Tu Quoque, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.8% saturation with 97 hits. Analysis detected 582.583 faulty-reasoning hits from 162.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (21,131 of 26,816 speakers). This David Snyder is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
David Snyder
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 162.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510021.2% percentile
14.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos162.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 21.2%21.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.8%39.8%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.2%20.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 14.8%14.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.8%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 26.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 21.2%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 15.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos