Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video34 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Sear results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 34 hits. Analysis detected 34 faulty-reasoning hits from 34 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,075 of 28,364 speakers). This David Sear is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
David Sear
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 34
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos