Speaker summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video75 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Sack results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Optimism Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 72% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 107 faulty-reasoning hits from 75 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (12,485 of 28,364 speakers). This David Sack is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
David Sack
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠56%David Sack (selected)38%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 75
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
37.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos75 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 72.0%72.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 72.0%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos