Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Martin results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Genetic Fallacy, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 288 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,060 of 28,037 speakers). This David Martin is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
David Martin
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos