Speaker summary
⁠33%2 analyzed articles/videos123 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Gudgel results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Optimism Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 36 faulty-reasoning hits from 123 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 38.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (12,274 of 28,364 speakers). This David Gudgel is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
David Gudgel
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 123
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
38.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos123 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 38.3%38.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Optimism Bias: Speaker 38.3%, sitewide 6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos