Speaker summary
ā 76% 1 analyzed article/video 100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David French results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man , Optimism Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Status Quo Bias as the most egregious example at 78.7% saturation with 88.5 hits . Analysis detected 426.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 100 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40.3% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (11,784 of 28,364 speakers). This David French is worse (more manipulative) than 58.50% of the peer group. David French
Speaker details
Total words: 100
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.5% percentile 40.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos100 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 78.7% 78.7% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 78.7% 78.7% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 39.3% 39.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 39.3% 39.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 39.3% 39.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 44.7% 44.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 16.0% 16.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 78.7%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Speaker 78.7%, sitewide 0.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 3.3% Primacy Effect: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst