Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video192.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Durocher results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question, Overconfidence Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 45.615 hits. Analysis detected 423.027 faulty-reasoning hits from 192.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠12% (25,054 of 28,364 speakers). This David Durocher is better (less manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group.
David Durocher
Speaker details
Total words: 192.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

12% percentile
025507510011.7% percentile
10.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos192.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 12.1%12.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.0%15.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 9.7%9.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 9.7%9.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%No True Scotsman: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos