Speaker summary
⁠65%1 analyzed article/video82.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Cruz results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Begging the Question, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.7% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 187.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 24.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠40% (17,068 of 28,364 speakers). This David Cruz is better (less manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
David Cruz
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 82.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510039.8% percentile
24.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 38.7%38.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos