Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video188 analyzed words
BS Summary: These David Chiu results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 44.2% saturation with 83.111 hits. Analysis detected 585.861 faulty-reasoning hits from 188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (19,762 of 28,364 speakers). This David Chiu is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
David Chiu
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
19.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos188 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 44.2%44.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 33.3%33.3%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 13.5%13.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 24.3%24.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 44.2%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 33.3%, sitewide 6.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 2.5%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 24.3%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 13.5%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 8.1%Composition/Division: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos