Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dave Yost results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 78.3% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,622 of 28,364 speakers). This Dave Yost is worse (more manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Dave Yost
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.0% percentile
33.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 78.3%78.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 61.7%61.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.8%10.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 10.8%10.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 78.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 61.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos