Speaker summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video146.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Darryl Williams results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 41.1% saturation with 67.875 hits. Analysis detected 371.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 146.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,288 of 28,364 speakers). This Darryl Williams is better (less manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Darryl Williams
Speaker details
Total words: 146.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.5% percentile
22.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos146.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 41.1%41.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 27.7%27.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.6%36.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.1%19.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 13.6%13.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.0%15.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 12.7%12.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Halo Effect: Speaker 41.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.6%, sitewide 11.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 27.7%, sitewide 1.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.0%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.0%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos