Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dante Lindo results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Personal Incredulity as the most egregious example at 87.5% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 116.906 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 71.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,748 of 28,364 speakers). This Dante Lindo is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Dante Lindo
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 32
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.7% percentile
71.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos32 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 87.5%87.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 56.3%56.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 43.8%43.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 9.1%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 87.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 56.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 43.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos