Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video52 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny Perez results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Halo Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58.5 hits. Analysis detected 175.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 52 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,122 of 26,730 speakers). This Danny Perez is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Danny Perez
Speaker details
Total words: 52
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos52 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos