Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danny Emerman results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 142 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 61.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (6,638 of 26,967 speakers). This Danny Emerman is worse (more manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Danny Emerman
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.4% percentile
61.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 55.2%55.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 44.8%44.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 44.8%44.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 55.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Speaker 44.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 44.8%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos