Speaker summary
54%2 analyzed articles/videos162.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Rhoades Ha results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.3% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 477.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 162.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (18,655 of 28,364 speakers). This Danielle Rhoades Ha is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Danielle Rhoades Ha
Speaker details
Total words: 162.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
21.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos162.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.7%30.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.3%37.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 25.8%25.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 16.2%16.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 19.3%19.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.7%, sitewide 1.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 16.2%, sitewide 1.7%Red Herring: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate