Speaker summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video95.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danielle Carter results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 185 faulty-reasoning hits from 95.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (12,835 of 28,364 speakers). This Danielle Carter is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Danielle Carter
Speaker details
Total words: 95.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
36.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos95.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 30.8%30.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 30.8%30.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.8%30.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 30.8%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos