Speaker summary
⁠31%1 analyzed article/video1,264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Danieli Evans results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Burden of Proof, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 157 hits. Analysis detected 870.038 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,273 of 28,364 speakers). This Danieli Evans is better (less manipulative) than 99.70% of the peer group.
Danieli Evans
Speaker details
Total words: 1,264
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

0% percentile
02550751000.3% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 1.8%1.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 0.3%0.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Red Herring: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos