Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniela Behrens results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 550 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 72.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,725 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniela Behrens is worse (more manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Daniela Behrens
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510079.8% percentile
72.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos