Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video19.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Stenberg results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and Overconfidence Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 13 hits. Analysis detected 39 faulty-reasoning hits from 19.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (8,657 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel Stenberg is worse (more manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group.
Daniel Stenberg
Speaker details
Total words: 19.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

70% percentile
025507510069.5% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos19.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 50.0%50.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 4.6%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos