Speaker summary
⁠66%2 analyzed articles/videos108.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel N. Rosen results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 365.305 faulty-reasoning hits from 108.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,286 of 28,364 speakers). This Daniel N. Rosen is better (less manipulative) than 53.90% of the peer group.
Daniel N. Rosen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠47%Daniel N. Rosen (selected)29%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 108.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

46% percentile
025507510046.1% percentile
28.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos108.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 56.8%56.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 31.4%31.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.4%35.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 19.8%19.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 56.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 8.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 31.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos